Difference between revisions of "Rat II"

From Thermionic Studios
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Artists)
m
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==General Information==
 
==General Information==
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xrBGitOIc4
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xrBGitOIc4
 +
 +
From http://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13679 :
 +
<blockquote>
 +
<div style="background-color:#222222; border:2px solid #e69710; padding:10px; {{border-radius|8px}}">
 +
People say that the OPO7 is thinner or harsher sounding than a LM308. I think, however, that this perception may be down to the fact that a lot of the Chinese Rats have 0.0027uf instead of a 0.0033uf cap in the tone control. This will make a OPO7 Rat sound brighter at the same tone settings compared to a LM308 Rat.
 +
 +
If you bump the compensation cap of a OPO7 up from 33pf to a 100-150pf to compensate for the fact that the OPO7 has a faster slew rate than a LM308 then they sound pretty much the same to me.
 +
</div>
 +
</blockquote>
  
 
==Pedal Manual==
 
==Pedal Manual==

Revision as of 17:16, 21 February 2018

We put background information here

Controls

General Information

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xrBGitOIc4

From http://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13679 :

People say that the OPO7 is thinner or harsher sounding than a LM308. I think, however, that this perception may be down to the fact that a lot of the Chinese Rats have 0.0027uf instead of a 0.0033uf cap in the tone control. This will make a OPO7 Rat sound brighter at the same tone settings compared to a LM308 Rat.

If you bump the compensation cap of a OPO7 up from 33pf to a 100-150pf to compensate for the fact that the OPO7 has a faster slew rate than a LM308 then they sound pretty much the same to me.

Pedal Manual

Phase Inversion

Schematic

Artists


Additional Sources