Difference between revisions of "Rat II"
m (→Artists) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|} | |} | ||
[[ProCo]] Rat II. This is today what is sold by ProCo as "The Rat". It's a chinese-made pedal and no longer uses the LM308 opamp integrated circuit (IC). | [[ProCo]] Rat II. This is today what is sold by ProCo as "The Rat". It's a chinese-made pedal and no longer uses the LM308 opamp integrated circuit (IC). | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Thermionic Studios has one(1) ProCo Rat II available for rental''' | ||
==Controls== | ==Controls== | ||
| − | ==Bypass:True== | + | ==Bypass: True== |
The ProCo Rat II is true bypass. | The ProCo Rat II is true bypass. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
| − | ==Phase Inversion== | + | ==Phase Inversion: Yes/No== |
Revision as of 00:43, 13 March 2019
ProCo Rat II. This is today what is sold by ProCo as "The Rat". It's a chinese-made pedal and no longer uses the LM308 opamp integrated circuit (IC).
- Thermionic Studios has one(1) ProCo Rat II available for rental
Controls
Bypass: True
The ProCo Rat II is true bypass.
General Information
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xrBGitOIc4
From http://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13679 :
People say that the OPO7 is thinner or harsher sounding than a LM308. I think, however, that this perception may be down to the fact that a lot of the Chinese Rats have 0.0027uf instead of a 0.0033uf cap in the tone control. This will make a OPO7 Rat sound brighter at the same tone settings compared to a LM308 Rat.
If you bump the compensation cap of a OPO7 up from 33pf to a 100-150pf to compensate for the fact that the OPO7 has a faster slew rate than a LM308 then they sound pretty much the same to me.
Pedal Manual
Phase Inversion: Yes/No
Schematic
Artists
We are currently unaware of any artists actively using the pedal now, or who have in the past.
- Additional Sources
